Blog

Mediating a custody case in Texas, rather than going to court, offers several advantages. Here are some key reasons why mediation is often a better option than going to trial:

• Control Over the Outcome

• Mediation allows you and the other parent to negotiate and create a custody arrangement that works for your family’s specific needs. You can decide on the terms, such as visitation schedules, parenting plans, and decision-making responsibilities, rather than having a judge make those decisions for you.
• In contrast, going to Court a third party who does not know you (a judge) will determine the outcome of your case.  A judge will make decisions based on what they believe is in the best interest of the child based on how the law is says to. This may not align with your preferences or the unique circumstances of your family.
• Confidentiality

• Mediation is a private and confidential process. What is discussed in mediation cannot be used against you in court if you cannot reach an agreement. This provides a more open environment for discussing sensitive issues. It also allows you to process the agreements as they are being made.
• Court proceedings are public, meaning that any private details of your life or family situation could become part of the public record, which can feel invasive. Also, anyone not a party of your case can sit in the courtroom and hearing the details of your life.
• Lower Costs

• Mediation is generally much less expensive than going to trial. Mediating a custody dispute typically requires fewer resources and may help you avoid lengthy court battles.
• Going to trial often involves multiple hearings, which can increase costs significantly. The costs associated with hiring experts, paying for depositions, and covering attorney fees can quickly add up in a contested court case.
• Faster Resolution

• Mediation typically takes less time than a court trial. Mediation sessions can often be scheduled relatively quickly, and the process can sometimes be completed in a single day. In contrast, court cases can take months, especially if the case is complex or highly contested and typically lasts 1 – 4 days on the average.
• A quicker resolution can help minimize the emotional and financial toll on everyone involved.
• Preservation of Relationships

• Mediation is a less adversarial process compared to court. The goal is to find a solution that both parties can agree on, with the assistance of a neutral mediator. This collaborative approach can help preserve the relationship between the parents, which is important for co-parenting and making joint decisions for the child in the future.
• Court trials are often contentious, with both parties speaking badly of the other parent so they can win. This can harm the ability to co-parent effectively, especially if the parents need to interact regularly for the sake of their child.
• Customizable Solutions

• In mediation, you have the opportunity to be creative and flexible in creating a parenting plan. The mediator can help you explore different options that might work better for your child and family, which may not always be available in a courtroom.
• Court decisions are generally based on standard guidelines and may not always accommodate the individual needs of the parents or children involved.
• Better for Children

• Mediation allows you and the other parent to focus on what is best for the child and to make decisions collaboratively. Studies show that children tend to fare better when parents are involved in creating the custody arrangement, as they feel less caught in the middle of a conflict.
• Court battles, on the other hand, can expose children to stress, emotional strain, and conflict, which can be detrimental to their well-being. Believe it or not even if you are not discussing the case with the child (which you should never do), that child sees and hears more than you think. That child then carries that burden moving forward.
• Higher Compliance Rates

• Agreements reached in mediation are typically adhered to more closely because both parties have been involved in the process and have had a say in the outcome. The agreement is often more meaningful and practical for both parents.
• A court order, on the other hand, may feel imposed on one or both parties, making it harder for the parents to work together and comply with the arrangement over time.
• Neutral Third-Party Assistance

• Mediators are trained professionals who guide both parents through the process and help facilitate constructive communication. They are neutral and cannot take sides. Mediators focus on helping both parents come to an agreement that is in the child’s best interest.
• In court, the judge may not have the same level of insight into your family dynamics and may make a decision based on limited information.
• Less Stressful

• Mediation is generally less stressful than going through a courtroom battle. It provides a calmer, more cooperative environment to work through difficult issues and reach a resolution.
• Court can be a tense and adversarial environment, which may increase stress and conflict for both parents.

When Mediation May Not Be Appropriate

While mediation has many benefits, it may not be suitable in cases where there is a history of domestic violence, substance abuse, or abuse or neglect of the child. In such cases, the safety and well-being of the child or the parent may require court intervention. However, even in these situations, mediation may be an option if both parents agree to a safe and structured process, sometimes with the assistance of a mediator trained to handle sensitive cases.

Mediation offers many advantages in a custody case, such as more control over the outcome, lower costs, faster resolution, and the ability to preserve relationships. It’s a less adversarial approach that prioritizes collaboration and the best interest of the child. However, if you believe that mediation is not safe or appropriate for your situation, consulting with an attorney can help you determine the best course of action.